Evidence

A score you cannot open is a score you cannot check

Everything a trial produced is stored beside the figure it produced. That is what makes a published number auditable rather than asserted, and it is the reason this platform costs more to run than one that keeps only totals.

Every trial kept, not summarised

A trial is a row, and the row points at the bytes.

The bundle
The archive as it was submitted, content-addressed by its sha256, so the task that was graded is the task you can fetch.
The trajectory
What the agent actually did, step by step, stored per trial. Gate 6 requires a reviewer to open at least two failing ones before anything may be accepted.
The verifier's output
Reward, plus whatever the suite wrote to /logs. The number and the log that produced it are stored together or not at all.
The cost
Tokens, cached and reasoning counted separately, and wall time. A trial's cost is never derived from the trajectory; the run's own counts are the authority.

Reproducible across model versions

Re-running a score next quarter has to run the same bytes, or the comparison means nothing.

Images pinned by digest
Agent and verifier images are built rootless and pinned by sha256. A floating tag could change between the run that admitted a task and the benchmark that cites it, which would break attribution silently.
Inputs regenerated
Gate 4 regenerates a task's inputs and requires the reference solution to still score 1.0 while a replay of the old answer scores 0 — which is how a memorised task is caught.
One engine for both
A gate run and a benchmark run are the same engine, so a figure from one is comparable with a figure from the other by construction rather than by convention.

A person read the transcript

The one gate that is not automatic, and the reason it is not.

Not the author
Gate 6 requires a reviewer who did not submit the task. Authorship is read from who uploaded the bundle, not from who first created the task name.
Two failing trajectories
At least two have to be opened before an accept is possible, and the opening is recorded as an access event. A review nobody can evidence is not a review.